Systematic Review Centre for Laboratory Animal Experimentation (SYRCLE)

The Systematic Review Centre for Laboratory Animal Experimentation (SYRCLE) has adopted Systematic Review (SR) as its methodological approach for the synthesis of evidence. SYRCLE has published a step-by-step guide to systematically identify all relevant animal studies.

The Systematic Review Centre for Laboratory Animal Experimentation (SYRCLE) is the research and education centre of the Central Animal Laboratory (CDL) of the Radboud University Medical Center, The Netherlands. The Centre has adopted Systematic Review (SR) as its methodological approach for the synthesis of evidence.

In a systematic review, all research evidence relevant to a specific question is identified, selected, appraised and synthesized in order to enable evidenced-based decisions. A systematic review can contain a meta-analysis, where the results of several independent studies are statistically combined to calculate the average effect of two or more studies addressing the same question in more or less the same way.
SYRCLE has published A step-by-step guide to systematically identify all relevant animal studies. The Guide contains detailed instructions on how to develop a comprehensive search strategy. Search filters for PubMed and for Embase have been developed. These search filters facilitate finding all animal studies on a specific topic. An updated Embase filter has been published.

The conduct of high-quality SR is also hampered by the lack of reporting of essential details in animal studies. SYRCLE has therefore also developed the Gold Standard Publication Checklist (GSPC), which sets out in detail what a scientist should consider when reporting and designing an animal experiment (e.g. housing conditions, nutrition, drinking water supply and details of the intervention). The GSPC is easy to use and particularly suitable for making systematic reviews of animal studies more feasible. SYRCLE recommends the checklist to all scientists involved in animal experimentation and editors of journals publishing animal studies.

The extent to which a systematic review can draw reliable conclusions depends on the validity of the results of the included studies. SYRCLE has developed a tool to assess the risk of bias in the included animal studies. SYRCLE's Risk of Bias tool is based on the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool and is adjusted for particular aspects of bias playing a role in animal intervention studies.

More information about systematic reviews and literature searches is available in a separate section of Norecopa's website.

This page was updated on 25 October 2018

Fant du det du lette etter?

Ja, jeg fant det! Nei, jeg fant det ikke!

Takk for din tilbakemelding! Vær oppmerksom på at vi ikke kan kontakte deg hvis ikke du oppgir din epostadresse.

Hva lette du etter?

Gi oss gjerne en tilbakemelding slik at vi kan forbedre informasjonen på siden. På forhånd takk for hjelpen! Vennligst skriv inn din epostadresse hvis du vil ha et svar.

Kontakt oss gjerne på e-post hvis du har spørsmål.

Takk for din tilbakemelding! Vær oppmerksom på at vi ikke kan kontakte deg hvis ikke du oppgir din epostadresse.



 

Abonnér på nyhetsbrevene fra Norecopa