Perfluoroalkyl substances in aquatic environment-comparison of fish and passive sampling approaches

By Daniel Cerveny - Roman Grabic - Ganna Fedorova - Katerina Grabicova - Jan Turek - Vit Kodes - Oksana Golovko - Vladimir Zlabek - Tomas Randak

The concentrations of seven perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) were investigated in 36 European chub (Squalius cephalus) individuals from six localities in the Czech Republic. Chub muscle and liver tissue were analysed at all sampling sites. In addition, analyses of 16 target PFASs were performed in Polar Organic Chemical Integrative Samplers (POCISs) deployed in the water at the same sampling sites. We evaluated the possibility of using passive samplers as a standardized method for monitoring PFAS contamination in aquatic environments and the mutual relationships between determined concentrations.Only perfluorooctane sulphonate was above the LOQ in fish muscle samples and 52% of the analysed fish individuals exceeded the Environmental Quality Standard for water biota. Fish muscle concentration is also particularly important for risk assessment of fish consumers. The comparison of fish tissue results with published data showed the similarity of the Czech results with those found in Germany and France.However, fish liver analysis and the passive sampling approach resulted in different fish exposure scenarios. The total concentration of PFASs in fish liver tissue was strongly correlated with POCIS data, but pollutant patterns differed between these two matrices. The differences could be attributed to the metabolic activity of the living organism. In addition to providing a different view regarding the real PFAS cocktail to which the fish are exposed, POCISs fulfil the Three Rs strategy (replacement, reduction, and refinement) in animal testing.



Issued: 2016

Journal Title: Environmental research

ISSN: 0013-9351

Volume issue: 144

Pages: 92 - 98

Publisher: Elsevier Inc.

AGRICOLA identifier: IND606059851

DOI identifier: 10.1016/j.envres.2015.11.010
This page was updated on 11 February 2021

Did you find what you were looking for?

Yes, I found it! No, I did not!

Thanks for your feedback! Please note that we cannot reply to you unless you send us an email.

What are you looking for?

We value your feedback so we can improve the information on the page. Please add your email address if you would like a reply. Thank you in advance for your help.!

Please contact us by email if you have any questions.

Thanks for your feedback! Please note that we cannot reply to you unless you send us an email.

RadioButtonList field
 

Abonnér på nyhetsbrevene fra Norecopa