This page can be accessed from: https://norecopa.no/scruff
If an animal is picked up by the scruff of its neck using a two-fingered technique, this has a tendency to create a longitudinal skin fold on the animal. This can tighten the skin over the throat and trachea, causing stress to the animal.
Video film of the technique:
Norecopa, in collaboration with the Norwegian University of Life Sciences, has produced a 2-minute video film, available in English and Spanish, illustrating a refinement of this technique using three fingers, which creates a transverse skin fold on the animal, thereby relieving the pressure on the throat:
We welcome feedback about this technique!
We are very grateful to Rafael Frías for providing the text for the Spanish version of this film.
A poster of the technique (shown below) may be downloaded from norecopa.no/scruff-poster
Labitt et al. (2021), using validated smartphone-based ECG measurements, detected severe bradyarrhythmias during immobilisation in mice of both sexes and four strains using the traditional means of restraint which creates a longitudinal skin fold and ventral neck crease. The arrhythmias persisted for an average of 4 minutes after the mice were released. These effects were not seen with the three-finger method described on this page.
Henderson et al. (2020) examined anxiety-like behaviour in mice exposed to repeated scruffing with the standard method or with this three-fingered approach. They were, however, unable to detect significant differences between the two groups.
Our experience suggests that the three-fingered technique reduces clinical signs of stress such as gasping, cyanosis and exophthalmos.
This technique was developed for immobilisation in connection with oral gavage or close inspection of the mouse. Subcutaneous injections were given using an approach with much less restraint, over the lower back, where a skin fold can be lifted up with the needle tip (as soon as it has penetrated the skin, and avoiding underlying muscle) to form a "tent" under which the injection is given.
This technique was developed to mitigate the effects of scruffing rodents when there was a need for complete immobilisation of the animal. Since rodents are prey in the wild, any form of immobilisation (however refined) is likely to be stressful and should be avoided if at all possible, or reduced to an absolute minimum. Many alternatives to the traditional methods of handling and injecting animals are now available, including micropipette-guided drug administration (MDA) (click here for links and see also the Refinement Wiki).
More information on preparing for animal research and testing
Films and slide shows about other handling techniques
Homemade educational materials
Resources relevant to the covid-19 pandemic
Other teaching resources
Links to guidelines for the care and use of animals in research and testing
Did you find what you were looking for?Yes, I found it! No, I did not!
Thanks for your feedback! Please note that we cannot respond unless you supply your email address.
What are you looking for?
Please give us your feedback so we can improve the information on the page. Thank you in advance for your help. Please add your email address if you would like a reply.Please contact us by email if you have any questions.